•  
  •  
 

Publisher

The Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law (ADFSL)

Abstract

Cyber crime is a growing problem, with the impact to society increasing exponentially, but the ability of local law enforcement agencies to investigate and successfully prosecute criminals for these crimes is unclear. Many national needs assessments have previously been conducted, and all indicated that state and local law enforcement did not have the training, tools, or staff to effectively conduct digital investigations, but very few have been completed recently. This study provided a current and localized assessment of the ability of Indiana law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate crimes involving digital evidence, the availability of training for both law enforcement officers and prosecuting attorneys, and the ability of prosecuting attorneys to pursue and obtain convictions in cases involving digital evidence. The results support the recommendation that a comprehensive resource guide is needed, as standard operating procedures are lacking, and law enforcement is unaware of available training courses and resources.

References

About (webpage) for National Computer Forensic Institute (2014). Retrieved from https://www.ncfi.usss.gov/ncfi/pages/about.jsf

Basic Training – Tier I (webpage) for Indiana Law Enforcement Academy (2014). Retrieved from http://www.in.gov/ilea/2380.htm

Bhaskur, R. (2006, February). State and Local Law Enforcement is not Ready for a Cyber Katrina. Communications from the ACM, 49(2), 81-83.

Bossler, A., & Holt, T. (2011). Patrol officers’ perceived role in responding to cybercrime. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(1), p. 165-181.

Brenner, S., & Schwerha, J. (2002). Transnational Evidence Gathering and Local Prosecution of International Cybercrime. The John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law, 20(347).

Bulbul, H. I., Yavuzcan, G. H., & Ozel, M. (2013). Digital Forensics: An Analytical Crime Scene Procedure Model (ACSPM). Forensic Science International, 233, 244 - 256.

Casey, E., Katz, G., & Lewthwaite, J. (2013). Honing digital forensic processes. Digital Investigation, 10, 138-147.

Center for Strategic and International Studies, McAfee. (2014, June). Net Losses: Estimating the Global Cost of Cybercrime. Santa Clara, CA.

Courses (webpage) for National Computer Forensic Institute (2014). Retrieved from https://www.ncfi.usss.gov/ncfi/pages/courses.jsf

Cyber Crime (webpage) for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (2015). Retrieved on October 17, 2015 from https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/cyber

Cybercrime and Investigative Technologies Section (webpage) for Indiana State Police (2015). Retrieved on October 17, 2015 from http://www.in.gov/isp/3234.htm.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (2014). 2014 Internet Crime Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt Printing Office.

Gogolin, G., Jones, J. (2010). Law Enforcement’s Ability to Deal with Digital Crime and the Implications for Business. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 19, 109-117.

Goodison, S., Davis, R., & Jackson, B. (2015). Digital Evidence and the U.S. Criminal Justice System. Identifying Technology and Other Needs to More Effectively Acquire and Utilize Digital Evidence. Priority Criminal Justice Needs Initiative. Rand Corporation.

Henry, P., Williams, J., & Wright, B. (2013, July). The SANS Survey of Digital Forensics and Incident Response. SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room.

Hickman, M. J., & Peterson, J. L. (2004, September). Census of Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories: 50 Largest Crime Labs, 2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics Fact Sheet.

Inservice Training (webpage) for Indiana Law Enforcement Academy (2014). Retrieved from http://www.in.gov/ilea/2376.htm

Institute for Security Technology Studies (2002, June). Law Enforcement Tools and Technologies for Investigating Cyber Attacks: A National Needs Assessment.

Law Enforcement Training Courses (webpage) for Purdue University Cyberforensics Laboratory (2014). Retrieved from http://cyberforensics.purdue.edu/lawenforcement.php

National Institute of Justice. (2004). Status and Needs of Forensic Science Service Providers: A Report to Congress.

National White Collar Crime Center (webpage) (2015). Retrieved on October 17, 2015 from https://www.nw3c.org/

Pricewaterhouse Coopers, CSO Magazine, CERT Division of Carnegie Mellon University, & United States Secret Service. (2015). U.S. cybersecurity: Progress stalled. Key Findings from the 2015 US State of Cybercrime survey. Delaware.

Rogers, M. K., & Seigfried, K. (2004). The future of computer forensics: a needs analysis survey. Computers & Security, 23, 12-16.

Schedule (webpage) for National Computer Forensic Institute (2014). Retrieved from https://www.ncfi.usss.gov/ncfi/pages/schedule.jsf

Stampaugh, H., Beaupre, D., Icove, Dr. David J., Baker, R., Cassaday, W., Williams, W. (2000, August). State and Local Law Enforcement Needs to Combat Electronic Crime. U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice Research in Brief.

State, Local, & Tribal (webpage) for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) (2014). Retrieved from https://www.fletc.gov/state-local-tribal

Training Calendar (webpage) for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) (2014). Retrieved from https://www.fletc.gov/training-calendar

Training at FLETC (webpage) for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) (2014). Retrieved from https://www.fletc.gov/training-catalog

Technical Working Group for Electronic Crime Scene Investigation (TWGECSI) (2001). Electronic Crime Scene Investigation: A Guide for First Responders. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

Verizon (2015). 2015 Data Breach Investigations Report. Verizon Enterprise. Retrieved from http://www.verizonenterprise.com/DBIR/2015/

Weiner-Bronner, D., (2014, April 22). Report Shows Cyber Crime is on the Rise. The Wire. Retrieved from http://www.thewire.com/technology/2014/04/report-shows-cyber-espionage-is-on-the-rise/361024/

West Virginia University College of Business & Economics (2008). Survey of Forensic Service Providers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2016.1374

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.