Abstract
This article discusses three significant conundrums that arise in planning to deter nuclear war: 1. decapitation of the strength of the opposition; 2. lack of clear ontological validity for nuclear weapons-related language; and 3. the simultaneity of deterrence and provocation in one action.
Recommended Citation
Editor, IBPP
(2000)
"Trends. Head Count and Nuclear War: What To Believe,"
International Bulletin of Political Psychology: Vol. 9
:
Iss.
17
, Article 2.
Available at:
https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp/vol9/iss17/2
Included in
Defense and Security Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political Theory Commons
