The Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law (ADFSL)
Drives found during investigations often have useful information in the form of email addresses which can be acquired by search in the raw drive data independent of the file system. Using this data we can build a picture of the social networks that a drive owner participated in, even perhaps better than investigating their online profiles maintained by social-networking services because drives contain much data that users have not approved for public display. However, many addresses found on drives are not forensically interesting, such as sales and support links. We developed a program to filter these out using a Naïve Bayes classifier and eliminated 73.3% of the addresses from a representative corpus. We show that the byte-offset proximity of the remaining addresses found on a drive, their word similarity, and their number of co-occurrences over a corpus are good measures of association of addresses, and we built graphs using this data of the interconnections both between addresses and between drives. Results provided several new insights into our test data.
Borgatti, S., & Everett, M. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks 21 (4), 375-395.
Broder, A. (June). On the resemblance and containment of documents. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Compression and Complexity of Sequences, Positano, Italy, June (pp. 21-29), June 1997.
Bulk Extractor 1.5. (2013). Digital corpora: Bulk Extractor [software]. Retrieved on February 6, 2015 from digitalcorpora.org/ downloads/bulk_extractor.
Chirita, P.-A., Diederich, J., & Nejdl, W. (2005). MailRank: Using ranking for spam detection. Paper presented at the Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bremen, Germany, October-November (pp. 373-380).
Garfinkel, S., Farrell, P., Roussev, V., & Dinolt, G. (2009). Bringing science to digital forensics with standardized forensic corpora. Digital Investigation 6 (August), S2-S11.
Gross, B., & Churchill, E. (2007). Addressing constraints: Multiple usernames, task spillage, and notions of identity. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, US, April-May (pp. 2393-2398).
Holzer, R., Malin, B., & Sweeney, L. (2005). Email alias detection using social network analysis. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Link Discovery, Chicago, IL US, August (pp. 52-57).
Klensin, J, & Ko, Y. (2012, February). RFC 6530 proposed standard: Overview and framework for internationalized email. Retrieved February 4, 2016 from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6530.
Lee, S., Shishibori, M., & Ando, K. (2007). E-mail clustering based on profile and multi-attribute values. Paper presented at the Sixth International. Conference on Language Processing and Web Information Technology, Luoyang, China, August (pp. 3-8).
McCarrin, M., Green, J., & Gera, R. (2016). Visualizing relationships among email addresses. Forthcoming.
Newman, M. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69, (7), p. 066133.
Polakis, I., Kontaxs, G., Antonatos, S., Gessiou, E., Petsas, T., & Markatos, E. (2010). Using social networks to harvest email addresses. Paper presented at the Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, Chicago, IL, US, October (pp. 11-20).
Rowe, N., Schwamm, R., & Garfinkel, S. (2013). Language translation for file paths. Digital Investigation, 10S (August), S78-S86.
Zhou, D., Manavoglu, E., Li, J., Giles, C., & Zha, H. (2006). Probabilistic models for discovering e-communities. Paper presented at the World Wide Web Conference, Edinburgh, UK, May (pp. 173-182).
Rowe, Neil C.; Schwamm, Riqui; McCarrin, Michael R.; and Gera, Ralucca
"Making Sense of Email Addresses on Drives,"
Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law: Vol. 11
, Article 10.
Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl/vol11/iss2/10