•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Cyberbullying and internet trolling are both forms of online aggression or cyberharassment; however, research has yet to assess the prevalence of these behaviors in relationship to one another. In addition, the current study was the first to investigate whether individual differences and self-esteem discerned between self-reported cyberbullies and/or internet trolls (i.e., Never engaged in either, Cyberbully-only, Troll-only, Both Cyberbully and Troll). Of 308 respondents solicited from Mechanical Turk, 70 engaged in cyberbullying behaviors, 20 engaged in only trolling behaviors, 129 self-reported both behaviors, and 89 self-reported neither behavior. Results yielded low self-esteem, low conscientiousness, and low internal moral values for both cyberbullying and trolling behaviors. However, there were differentiating factors between individuals who only engaged in cyberbu lying behaviors (high on neuroticism) vs. trolling-only behaviors (high on openness to experience). Individuals who engaged in both behaviors scored higher on extraversion, lower on agreeableness, and lower on self-esteem compared to individuals who engaged in neither behavior.

References

Arıcak, O.T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184.

Berinsky, A., Huber, G., & Lenz, G. (2011, June 20). Using Mechanical Turk as a subject recruitment tool for experimental research. Retrieved from web.mit.edu

Birnbaum, M.H. (Ed). (2000). Psychological experiments on the internet. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Bishop, J. (2013). The effect of deindividuation of the internet troller on criminal procedure implementation: An interview with a Hater. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(1), 28-48.

Brack, K., & Caltabiano, N. (2014). Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(2).

Bryce, J., & Fraser, J. (2013). “It’s common sense that it’s wrong”: Young people’s perceptions and experiences of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 783-787.

Buckels, E.E., Trapnell, P.D., & Paulhus, D.L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97-102.

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S.D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.

Casas, J., Del Ray, R., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2013). Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 580-587.

Celik, S., Atak, H., & Erguzen, A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (49), 129-150.

Corcoran, L., Connolly, I., & O’Moore, M. (2012). Cyberbullying in Irish schools: An investigation of personality and selfconcept. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 33(4), 153-165.

Corcoran, L., McGuckin, C., & Prentice, G. (2015). Cyberbullying or cyber aggression?: A review of existing definitions of cyberbased peer-to-peer aggression. Societies, 5, 245-255.

Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventor (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Del Rey, R., Elipe, P. & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2012). Bullying and cyberbullying: Overlapping and predictive value of cooccurrence. Psicothema, 24(4), 608-613.

Diamanduros, T., Downs, E., & Jenkins, S.J. (2008). The role of school psychologists in the assessment, prevention, and intervention of cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), 693-704.

Egan, V. (2009). The ‘Big Five’: Neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness as am organizational scheme for thinking about aggression and violence. In M. McMurran & R.C. Howard (Eds.). Personality Disorder and Violence: An Evidence Based Approach (pp. 63-84) United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internetmediated communication tool. New Media Society, 12(1), 109-125.

Eysenck, H.J. (1996). Personality and crime: Where do we stand. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 2(3), 143-152.

Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2013). Social relations and cyberbullying: The influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the internet. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 101-126.

Frisén, A., Jonsson, A., Persson, C. (2007). Adolescents’ perception of bullying: Who is the victim? Who is the bully? What can be done to stop bullying? Adolescence, 42(168), 749-761.

Gámez-Guadix, M., Orue, I., Smith, P., & Calvete, E. (2013). Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance abuse use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(4), 446-452.

Gibb, Z.G., & Devereux, P.G. (2014). Who does that anyway? Predictors and personality correlates of cyberbullying in college. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 8-16.

Grigg, D.W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 143-156.

Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215-242.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2010). Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221.

Jankauskiene, R., Kardelis, K., Sukys, S., Kardeliene, L. (2008). Associations between school bullying and psychosocial factors. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(2), 145-162.

Kokkinos, C.M., Antoniadou, N., Markos, A. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 204-214.

Krueger, R.F., & Tackett, J.L. (Eds.). (2006). Personality and Psychopathology. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

MacDonald, C.D., Roberts-Pittman, B. (2010). Cyberbullying among college students: Prevalence and demographic differences. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2003-2009.

McCrae, R.R., & Sutin, A.R. (2009). Openness to experience. In M.R. Leary and R.H. Hoyle (Eds.). Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 257- 273). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Palladino, B.M., Frisén, A., Berne, S., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Calmaestra, J., Scheihauer, H., . . . Smith, P.K. (2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 455-463.

Miller, J.D., Lynam, D.R., & Jones, S. (2008). Externalizing behavior through the lens of the five-factor model: A focus on agreeableness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 158-164.

Ojedokun, O., & Idemudia, E.S. (2013). The moderating role of emotional intelligence between PEN personality factors and cyberbullying in a student population. Life Science Journal. 10(3). 1924-1930.

O’Moore, M. & Kirkham (2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 27(4), 269-283.

Ozden, M.S., & Icellioglu, S. (2013). The perception of cyberbullying and cybervictimization by university students in terms of their personality factors. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4379-4383.

Patchin, J.W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169.

Patchin, J.W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80(12), 614-621.

Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1023-1031.

Phillips, W. (2011). LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online. First Monday, 16(12).

Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Renati, R., Berrone, C., & Zanetti, M. (2012). Morally disengaged and unempathic: Do cyberbulllies fit these definitions? An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(8), 391-398.

Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 615-627.

Rogers, M. (2001). A social learning theory and moral disengagement analysis of criminal computer behavior: An exploratory study. Unpublished dissertation, University of Manitoba, Canada.

Rogers, M., Seigfried, K., & Tidke, K. (2006a). Self-reported computer criminal behavior: A psychological analysis. Digital Investigation, 3, 116-120.

Rogers, M., Smoak, N.D., & Liu, J. (2006b). Self-reported computer criminal behavior: A big-5, moral choice and manipulative exploitive behavior analysis. Deviant Behavior, 27, 1-24.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Salmivalli,C., Kaukiainen, A., Kaistaniemi, L., & Lagerspez, K.M.J. (1999). Self-evaluated self-esteem, peer-evaluated self-esteem, and defensive egotism as predictors of adolescents’ participation in bullying situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1268-1278.

Santana, A.D. (2014). Virtuous or Vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18-33.

Schachaf, P., &, Hara, N. (2010). Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 357-370.

Schenk, A.M., Fremouw, W.J., & Keelan, C.M. (2013). Characteristics of college cyberbullies. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2320-2327.

Schenk, A.M., & Fremouw W.J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of School Violence, 11(1), 21-37.

Seigfried-Spellar, K.C., & Treadway, K.N. (2014). Differentiating hackers, identity thieves, cyberbullies, and virus writers by college major and individual differences. Deviant Behavior, 35(10), 782-803.

Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.

Stanglin, D., & Welch, W. (2013, October 16). Two girls arrested on bullying charges after suicide. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com

Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 52-67.

Stopcyberbullying.org, n.d. “Are you a cyberbully?” Retrieved on May 10, 2014 from http://stopcyberbullying.org/kids/are_you_a_cyberbully.html.

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326.

Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Thompson, N. (2013, July 15). Internet trolls: What to do about the scourge of the web? CNN World. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com

Tokunaga, R.S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277- 287.

Vandebosch, H. & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media and Society, 11(8), 1349-1371.

Warner, R.M. (2007). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Whiteside, S.P., & Lynam, D.R. (2001). The five-factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 699-689.

Widiger, T. (2004). Five factor model rating form (FFMRF). Retrieved from www.uky.edu/~widiger/ffmrf.rtf

Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2009). Extraversion. In M.R. Leary, & R.H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 27-45). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

DOI

http://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2016.1415

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.