Digital technology nowadays covers all the spheres of life of an individual and society’s activities. With this, it is not a secret that it can be used both for the benefit and to the detriment of the person. In digital age, private life is becoming most vulnerable to arbitrary interference. This article considers various violations of the rights to privacy, communication safety and inviolability of privacy security brought in by the digital revolution. The article concludes that the most important task in the sphere of private life safety is to find a balance of interests of the state, the society and individuals. Private life restrictions caused by the new global threats should not lead to complete disappearance of privacy.
Baude, W. & Stern, J.Y. (2016). The positive law model of the fourth amendment. Harvard Law Review, vol. 129, № 7, pp. 1883–1884.
Bird, S.J. (2013). Security and privacy: Why privacy matters. Science and engineering ethics, vol. 19, № 3, pp. 669–671.
Brandeis L. & Warren, S. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, vol. IV, № 5.
Code of Ethics for the Information Society. Retrieved on July 23, 2016 from
Digital duplications and the fourth amendment (2016). Harvard Law Review, vol. 129, № 4, pp. 1046.
Federal law of 2006, July, 27 № 152-FZ "On personal data". Russian newspaper, 2006, July 29.
Gilbert, A. (2015). Privacy advocates call for RFID regulation. Retrieved on July 30, 2016 from http://www.cnet.com/news/privacy-advocates-call-for-rfid-regulation
Kokotov, A.N. (2015). On the Lawmaking matters of the Acts of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Russian Law: theory and practice, № 1, p. 13. (In Russ.).
Kravets, D. Worker fired for disabling GPS app that tracked her 24 hours a day. Retrieved on July 23, 2016 from
Losavio, M. (2014). Evidentiary power and property of digital identifiers and the impact on privacy rights in the United States. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law (JDFSL), vol. 9, № 2, p. 202.
Martin v United Kingdom. Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights, 2003, № 8. (In Russ.).
NEWSru.com, (2016). Internet experts: "The Laws of Yarovaya-Ozerov" threaten national security. Retrieved on July 23, 2016 from
http://www.newsru.com/russia/21jun2016/nati onaldanger.htm (In Russ.).
Perova, N. (2012). Restrictions of freedom of expression to prevent disclosure of personal and state secrets in the law of the US and UK. Law and management. Twenty-first century, № 1(22), pp. 93–99. (In Russ.).
Petrukhin, I.L. (1999). Private life (legal aspects). State and law, № 1, pp. 4–73. (In Russ.).
Postsovet.ru, (2016). Retrieved on July 23, 2016 from
https://www.postsovet.ru/blog/russia/770006. html (In Russ.).
Roman Zakharov v Russia (complaint № 47143/ 06). Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights, 2016, № 6. (In Russ.).
Tarle, E.G. Right to private life in Russia. The Law, March, pp. 163–166. (In Russ.).
The appellate decision of the Perm regional court from 2014, Mach, 12 in case № 33-1914. Retrieved on July 30, 2016 from
The decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 1997, March, 6 № 188 "On approval of List of data of confidential character". Russian newspaper, 1997, March, 14.
The information security doctrine of the Russian Federation (approved by the President of the Russian Federation from September 9, 2000, № PR-1895). Russian newspaper, 2000, September 28.
The resolution of the Seventeenth arbitration court of appeal dated 2016, January, 15 № 17АП-17396/2015-AK in case № A60-33071/2015. Retrieved from
The Rt Hon the Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, (2014). European Human Rights – a force for good or a threat to democracy? Russian Law: theory and practice, № 2, p. 10.
Zhuravlev, M.S. (2014). Philosophy of information security. Proceedings of the Tula State University. Humanities, № 2, p. 42. (In Russ.)
Kuznetsova, Olga Anatolyevna and Bondarenko, Natalia
"Private Life Safety Provision in Digital Age,"
Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law: Vol. 12
, Article 9.
Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl/vol12/iss3/9