Document Type
Paper
Abstract
Additive Manufacturing (AM) has, in recent years, become one of the most widespread and preferred prototyping methods. The most popular additive manufacturing method is Fused Deposition Modeling. FDM’s popularity is primarily attributed to its 3 major strengths of rapid prototyping, variability in material choice, and subject specific nature. The medical industry is one of the larger industries that has benefited from 3D printing especially in the terms of medical trainers. Unfortunately, most medical trainers that are developed (either being 3d printed or through traditional manufacturing processes) are poor substitutes for the human body. This can be attributed to either a poor design or poor material choice. FDM printing is the obvious solution to these issues, but one of the largest problems in 3D printing for engineers is that the properties of most filaments after extrusion are not well-known. Additionally, 3D prints are rarely 100% solid in FDM which makes assuming the material properties of the base materials inaccurate.
This project seeks to test 3D printed samples at numerous different infills of a common 3D printing material known as Thermoplastic Polyurethane of TPU using ASTM D638. The test samples will be printed across numerous printers with the same settings to determine whether different printers influence the material properties after a print. Once tensile testing has been completed the curves will be imported into an FEA software to be tested on numerous bone geometries to determine if TPU is a suitable material to use to mimic pediatric bones.
Original PPT
Tensile Testing of 3D Printed TPU Samples for Pediatric Biomaterial Applications
Additive Manufacturing (AM) has, in recent years, become one of the most widespread and preferred prototyping methods. The most popular additive manufacturing method is Fused Deposition Modeling. FDM’s popularity is primarily attributed to its 3 major strengths of rapid prototyping, variability in material choice, and subject specific nature. The medical industry is one of the larger industries that has benefited from 3D printing especially in the terms of medical trainers. Unfortunately, most medical trainers that are developed (either being 3d printed or through traditional manufacturing processes) are poor substitutes for the human body. This can be attributed to either a poor design or poor material choice. FDM printing is the obvious solution to these issues, but one of the largest problems in 3D printing for engineers is that the properties of most filaments after extrusion are not well-known. Additionally, 3D prints are rarely 100% solid in FDM which makes assuming the material properties of the base materials inaccurate.
This project seeks to test 3D printed samples at numerous different infills of a common 3D printing material known as Thermoplastic Polyurethane of TPU using ASTM D638. The test samples will be printed across numerous printers with the same settings to determine whether different printers influence the material properties after a print. Once tensile testing has been completed the curves will be imported into an FEA software to be tested on numerous bone geometries to determine if TPU is a suitable material to use to mimic pediatric bones.
