Presenter Information

Stanly G. Rosen

Location

Holiday Inn, Manatee Room

Start Date

26-4-1990 1:00 PM

End Date

26-4-1990 4:00 PM

Description

For the past forty years, the threat of retaliation has been the foundation of our national security strategy. This threat has been the basis of the deterrent strategy which has helped maintain a relatively peaceful relationship between the world's major powers. However, this strategy has also led to an expensive and possibly dangerous need to maintain large numbers of nuclear and conventional weapons around the world.

These difficulties with retaliatory deterrence are the main reason for many of the alternative strategies which are being considered. One alternative is to move beyond threat in structuring our national security posture. New technical and political opportunities may now make promoting mutual security rather than mutual threat a realistic means of protecting our Interests.

The advent and political acceptance of on-site- and space-based sensors and observers to verify compliance with arms control agreements has opened a new era of global stability and security. At the same time as nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles were being perfected, space-based observation systems were also coming to maturity. On the other hand, the provision for on-site observers to monitor treaty compliance on a large scale is a relatively recent phenomenon in the U.S.-Soviet relationship.

Comments

DOD Space Operations

Session Chairman: James K. McDonough, USAF, Air Force Space Command, Peterson AFB

Session Organizer: Gary Spirnak, USAF, 6555th Aerospace Test Group, CCAFS, FL

Share

COinS
 
Apr 26th, 1:00 PM Apr 26th, 4:00 PM

Paper Session III-C - Orbiting Sentinels For Security

Holiday Inn, Manatee Room

For the past forty years, the threat of retaliation has been the foundation of our national security strategy. This threat has been the basis of the deterrent strategy which has helped maintain a relatively peaceful relationship between the world's major powers. However, this strategy has also led to an expensive and possibly dangerous need to maintain large numbers of nuclear and conventional weapons around the world.

These difficulties with retaliatory deterrence are the main reason for many of the alternative strategies which are being considered. One alternative is to move beyond threat in structuring our national security posture. New technical and political opportunities may now make promoting mutual security rather than mutual threat a realistic means of protecting our Interests.

The advent and political acceptance of on-site- and space-based sensors and observers to verify compliance with arms control agreements has opened a new era of global stability and security. At the same time as nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles were being perfected, space-based observation systems were also coming to maturity. On the other hand, the provision for on-site observers to monitor treaty compliance on a large scale is a relatively recent phenomenon in the U.S.-Soviet relationship.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.