Presenter Email

desmond.bisandu@cranfield.ac.uk

Other Topic Area

Flight delay classification and prediction

Keywords

Analysis, BiLSTM, deep learning, Flight delay, Machine learning, Modelling

Abstract

Flight delays can be prevented by providing a reference point from an accurate prediction model because predicting flight delays is a problem with a specific space. Only a few algorithms consider predicted classes' mutual correlation during flight delay classification or prediction modelling tasks. None of these existing methods works for all scenarios. Therefore, the need to investigate the performance of more models in solving the problem of flight delay is vast and rapidly increasing. This paper presents the development and evaluation of LSTM and BiLSTM models by comparing them for a flight delay prediction. The LSTM does the feature extraction in both models, except that the BiLSTM maintains an equilibrium with a forward and backward hidden sequences model training. The experimental results show that the BiLSTM model accuracy improved by 97.56%, with a 21.11% accuracy increase. Furthermore, the models' performance results and confusion matrix shows how the BiLSTM model outperforms the LSTM model. In evaluating the MCC, the BiLSTM model offers a better mutual correlation among the predicted classes with 0.9944. Our findings suggest that for predicting flight delays, the BiLSTM model utilises the advantages of the bidirectional hidden sequences and the deep neural network for exploitation and exploration of best performance given a high accuracy, precision, recall and F1-Score results. Hence, we can recommend the BiLSTM in developing a decision support system for flight delays and related applications.

1528_NTAS_2022.pptx (2536 kB)
Presentation

Bios.docx (792 kB)
Bios

Share

COinS
 

A bidirectional deep LSTM machine learning method for flight delay modelling and analysis

Flight delays can be prevented by providing a reference point from an accurate prediction model because predicting flight delays is a problem with a specific space. Only a few algorithms consider predicted classes' mutual correlation during flight delay classification or prediction modelling tasks. None of these existing methods works for all scenarios. Therefore, the need to investigate the performance of more models in solving the problem of flight delay is vast and rapidly increasing. This paper presents the development and evaluation of LSTM and BiLSTM models by comparing them for a flight delay prediction. The LSTM does the feature extraction in both models, except that the BiLSTM maintains an equilibrium with a forward and backward hidden sequences model training. The experimental results show that the BiLSTM model accuracy improved by 97.56%, with a 21.11% accuracy increase. Furthermore, the models' performance results and confusion matrix shows how the BiLSTM model outperforms the LSTM model. In evaluating the MCC, the BiLSTM model offers a better mutual correlation among the predicted classes with 0.9944. Our findings suggest that for predicting flight delays, the BiLSTM model utilises the advantages of the bidirectional hidden sequences and the deep neural network for exploitation and exploration of best performance given a high accuracy, precision, recall and F1-Score results. Hence, we can recommend the BiLSTM in developing a decision support system for flight delays and related applications.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.