Is this project an undergraduate, graduate, or faculty project?

Undergraduate

individual

What campus are you from?

Daytona Beach

Authors' Class Standing

Charles Hruda, Senior

Lead Presenter's Name

Charles Hruda

Faculty Mentor Name

Scott Parr

Abstract

Global environmental and urban planning concerns have resulted in a large push for people to use cycling as a mode of transport. Topography, particularly uphill slopes can be huge deterrents for potential commuter cyclists, but electronic-assist bicycles are able to account for the physiological shortcomings of human beings. This paper analyzes and compares the required power output for professional cyclists against e-bike commuters to discover how much e-bikes can close the physiological gap between the two groups. For cycling on flat terrain, the majority of power is used to overcome aerodynamic resistance, which can vary heavily depending on rider position, and the effect of drafting, while the largest resistive force when cycling uphill is overcoming gravity. Professional cyclists output significantly less power even as solo riders on the flat terrain due to optimized aerodynamic positions, although e-bikes can provide enough power to maintain a constant speed of 30 kph. Uphill, the power required to overcome gravity is more than some affordable e-bikes can handle to maintain constant speeds of 20 kph and thus fall short of keeping up with the physiological abilities of professional cyclists.

Did this research project receive funding support from the Office of Undergraduate Research.

Yes, SURF

Share

COinS
 

Bicycle Transportation Accessibility: How Electronic-Assist Bicycles can Supplement Human Physiology

Global environmental and urban planning concerns have resulted in a large push for people to use cycling as a mode of transport. Topography, particularly uphill slopes can be huge deterrents for potential commuter cyclists, but electronic-assist bicycles are able to account for the physiological shortcomings of human beings. This paper analyzes and compares the required power output for professional cyclists against e-bike commuters to discover how much e-bikes can close the physiological gap between the two groups. For cycling on flat terrain, the majority of power is used to overcome aerodynamic resistance, which can vary heavily depending on rider position, and the effect of drafting, while the largest resistive force when cycling uphill is overcoming gravity. Professional cyclists output significantly less power even as solo riders on the flat terrain due to optimized aerodynamic positions, although e-bikes can provide enough power to maintain a constant speed of 30 kph. Uphill, the power required to overcome gravity is more than some affordable e-bikes can handle to maintain constant speeds of 20 kph and thus fall short of keeping up with the physiological abilities of professional cyclists.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.