Submitting Campus
Prescott
Department
Physics and Astronomy
Document Type
Article
Publication/Presentation Date
12-24-2008
Abstract/Description
In this article we study two problems that arise when using timing and amplitude estimates from a network of interferometers (IFOs) to evaluate the direction of an incident gravitational wave burst (GWB). First, we discuss an angular bias in the least squares timing-based approach that becomes increasingly relevant for moderate to low signal-to-noise ratios. We show how estimates of the arrival time uncertainties in each detector can be used to correct this bias. We also introduce a stand alone parameter estimation algorithm that can improve the arrival time estimation and provide root-sum-squared strain amplitude (h(rss)) values for each site. In the second part of the paper we discuss how to resolve the directional ambiguity that arises from observations in three non co-located IFOs between the true source location and its mirror image across the plane containing the detectors. We introduce a new, exact relationship among the h(rss) values at the three sites that, for sufficiently large signal amplitudes, determines the true source direction regardless of whether or not the signal is linearly polarized. Both the algorithm estimating arrival times, arrival time uncertainties, and h(rss) values and the directional follow-up can be applied to any set of gravitational wave candidates observed in a network of three non co-located IFOs. As a case study we test the methods on simulated waveforms embedded in simulations of the noise of the LIGO and Virgo detectors at design sensitivity.
Publication Title
Physical Review D
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.122003
Publisher
American Physical Society
Required Publisher’s Statement
Please view the publisher's version of this article here
Scholarly Commons Citation
Markowitz, J., Zanolin, M., Cadonati, L., & Katsavounidis, E. (2008). Gravitational Wave Burst Source Direction Estimation Using Time and Amplitude Information. Physical Review D, 78(12). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.122003
Additional Information
Dr. Zanolin was not affiliated with Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University at the time this paper was published.