Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning: An Empirical Study

Wendy L. Bedwell, University of Central Florida
Davin Pavlas, University of Central Florida
Kyle Heyne, University of Central Florida
Elizabeth H. Lazzara, University of Central Florida
Eduardo Salas, University of Central Florida

Dr. Lazzara was not affiliated with Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University at the time this paper was published.

Abstract/Description

The serious games community is moving toward research focusing on direct comparisons between learning outcomes of serious games and those of more traditional training methods. Such comparisons are difficult, however, due to the lack of a consistent taxonomy of game attributes for serious games. Without a clear understanding of what truly constitutes a game, scientific inquiry will continue to reveal inconsistent findings, making it hard to provide practitioners with guidance as to the most important attribute(s) for desired training outcomes. This article presents a game attribute taxonomy derived from a comprehensive literature review and subsequent card sorts performed by subject matter experts (SMEs). The categories of serious game attributes that emerged represent the shared mental models of game SMEs and serve to provide a comprehensive collection of game attributes. In order to guide future serious games research, the existing literature base is organized around the framework of this taxonomy.